Thursday, November 1, 2007

Why The Church Fathers Were So Negative About Sex

There can be little doubt that Christianity has a long history of being extremely negative about sex. Much of this is due to the negative influence of The Church Fathers. Here are a few quotes:

"We Christians marry only to produce children" - Justin Martyr (c. 100–165) .

"Adam and Eve were created sexless; their sin in Eden led to the horrors of sexual reproduction. If only our earliest progenitors had obeyed God, we would be procreating less sinfully now" [exactly how God would have populated the earth, he didn't say] - John of Damascus (writing in the eighth century).

Luther was much more positive about sex and marriage than those who came before him. Nevertheless, he seems to have believed that, although it may have been part of God's original design for husbands and wives to engage in sexual intercourse for the purpose of procreation, he also seems to eco the setiments of John of Damascus with this curious quote:

"The reproduction of mankind is a great marvel and mystery. Had God consulted me in the matter, I should have advised him to continue the generation of the species by fashioning them out of clay." - Martin Luther

Clement of Alexandria said:

"... the first man of our race did not await the appropriate time, desiring the favour of marriage before the proper hour and he fell into sin by not waiting the time of God's will...they [Adam and Eve] were impelled to do it before the normal time because they were still young and were persuaded by deception." - Clement of Alexandria (c. 150–215, On Marriage XIV:94, XVII:102-103).

He also stated:

"If a man marries in order to have children, he ought not to have a sexual desire for his wife. He ought to produce children by a reverent, disciplined act of will." - Clement of Alexandria

Augustine said pretty much the same thing:

"In Eden, it would have been possible to beget offspring without foul lust. The sexual organs would have been stimulated into necessary activity by will-power alone, just as the will controls other organs. Then, without being goaded on by the allurement of passion, the husband could have relaxed upon his wife's breasts with complete peace of mind and bodily tranquility, that part of his body not activated by tumultuous passion, but brought into service by the deliberate use of power when the need arose, the seed dispatched into the womb with no loss of his wife's virginity. So, the two sexes could have come together for impregnation and conception by an act of will, rather than by lustful cravings" - Saint Augustine, 354 – 430 (City of God, Book 14, Chapter 26).

Augustine was probably the most influential Christian theologian of all time. He has played a major role in formulating the traditional Christian doctrine of Original Sin. Augustine believed sin had its beginning in sexual desire.

Before his conversion, Augustine said he "ran wild in the jungle of erotic adventures." The problem, according to Augustine, was that his love had "no restraint imposed [on it] by the exchange of mind with mind." Hence, pure love was perverted by its misdirection toward worldly things, i.e. bodies. Ideally, according to Augustine, sex should be used only for procreation, and even then only in a relationship focused not on lust but on a loving, rational partnership. This is how he saw Adam and Eve relating before their fall. St. Augustine wrote to a friend:

"What is the difference whether it is in a wife or a mother, it is still Eve the temptress that we must beware of in any woman. I fail to see what use woman can be to man, if one excludes the function of bearing children."

Another quote from Augustine:

"It is one thing to lie together with the sole will of generating: this has no fault. It is another to seek the pleasure of flesh in lying, although within the limits of marriage, this has venial fault."

Theophilus of Antioch and St. Irenaeus also considered Adam to be in a premature age when he violated the precept of abstaining from a sexual union with Eve, his future wife. This was not because it was a wrong action, but because it was inappropriate for their age. This notion that the fall occurred in a period of immaturity before they achieved perfection is also shared by Peter Lombard, Hugo of St. Victor, Alexander of Hales, St. Bonaventura, John Duns Scotus and others in the Franciscan school.

St. Gregory (330-395), Bishop of Nyassa, taught that the sexual act was an outcome of the fall and that marriage is the outcome of sin.

St. Tertullian (150-230), said:

"Do you not know that you are each an Eve? The sentence of God on this sex of yours lives in this age: the guilt must of necessity live too. You are the Devil's gateway: You are the unsealer of the forbidden tree: You are the first deserter of the divine law: You are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert even the Son of God had to die" - St. Tertullian (150-230).

Aquinas said this:

"As regards the individual nature, woman is defective and misbegotten, for the active force in the male seed tends to the production of a perfect likeness in the masculine sex; while the production of woman comes from a defect in the active force or from some material indisposition, or even from some external influence" - Saint Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274).

Saint Jerome was the most learned of the Fathers of the Western Church. Jerome is best known as the translator of the Bible from Greek and Hebrew into Latin. Saint Jerome had what many describe as an anti-sexual obsession.

According to Jerome, Adam and Eve had a sexual relationship only after the Fall. Jerome believed that a husband could love his wife only if he abstained from all sexual intercourse with her. Jerome made a distinction between love and sexual lust. Love was divine, virginal, manly, asexual. Sexual lust was obscene, fit for pigs and dogs, rather than human beings. Of course, the Bible clearly does condemn sexual lust as obscene. Yet Jerome seemed to think that all sexual desires were sinful, even within marriage. Although he allowed for the use of sex within marriage to produce children, he preferred the state of celabacy. To St. Jerome, marriage was the Old Testament, the Law. It was "carnal" and thus stood condemned. Virginity, however, was the Gospel. To Jerome, becoming a Christian meant to be or to become a virgin. Jerome held that marriage was only instituted after the fall. Marriage partakes in the effects of sin.

"Matrimony is always a vice. All that can be done is to excuse it and to sanctify it; therefore it was made a religious sacrament" - Saint Jerome(347 – 420).

Other quotes from Jerome:

"Do you imagine that we approve of any sexual intercourse except for the procreation of children? He who is too ardent a lover of his own wife is an adulterer."

"Woman is the root of all evil."

Like most early Christian theologians, Jerome glorified virginity and looked down on marriage. His reasoning was rooted in Genesis:

"Eve in paradise was a virgin ... understand that virginity is natural and that marriage comes after the Fall."

The marital act to Jerome cannot be good because it only acts as a relief valve:

"Thus it must be bad to touch a woman. If indulgences is nonetheless granted to the marital act, this is only to avoid something worse. But what value can be recognized in a good that is allowed only with a view of preventing something worse?

Jerome wrote that the only good thing about marriage is that "it produces virgins." Jerome also wrote:

"And as regards Adam and Eve we must maintain that before the fall they were virgins in Paradise: but after they sinned, and were cast out of Paradise, they were immediately married."

Sexual Influence of the Ascetic Monks
Celibacy was in vogue during the fourth century, due to the influence of ascetic monks. Suffering for the sake of a higher state of spirituality was all the rage. The teaching became widespread that "only through monastic celibacy can man recover that natural—and sexless—state for which [man] was originally created `in the image' " of God (Sherrard, Philip. Christianity and Eros. 1976: 8). Christian monks up until the Renaissance complained bitterly of being visited in their sleep by succubi, female demons that gestured and beckoned lewdly to them, just as novitiate nuns were warned of the nocturnal visitations of their erotically enticing male counterparts, the incubi.

Sexual Influence Of The Church's Founding Fathers
The churches Founding Fathers had a profound and lasting impact on much of Christianity's teachings regarding sex. Much of their influence was extremely negative. To a large extent, they were a product of their times, influenced heavily by Greek, Roman and Persian teachings and traditions. They pushed the Apostle Paul's preference for celibacy to the limit, while lashing out against all sex. Fathers like Tertullian, Jerome, and Augustine promoted teachings that viewed human sexuality as detestable and unholy.

Robert T. Francoeur summarizes how Christianity got so negative about sex:

To understand the evolution from the early sex-affirming Hebraic culture to Christianity's persistent discomfort with sex and pleasure, we have to look at three interwoven threads: the dualistic cosmology of Plato [i.e. the soul and mind are at war with the body], the Stoic philosophy of early Greco-Roman culture [i.e., nothing should be done for the sake of pleasure], and the Persian Gnostic tradition [i.e., that demons created the world, sex and your body—in which your soul is trapped, and the key to salvation is to free the spirit from the bondage of the body by denying the flesh].

Within three centuries after Jesus, these influences combined to seduce Christian thinkers into a rampant rejection of human sexuality and sexual pleasure. (Robert T. Francoeur is a Catholic priest and a fellow of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sex. He is also a Professor of Human Embryology and Sexuality at Fairleigh Dickenson University. Francoeur has written no less than twenty books on human sexuality. This quote is taken from his essay The Religious Suppression of Eros.)

Conclusion: So Why Were The Church Fathers So Negative About Sex?
So again, why were the Church Fathers so negative about sex?

Certainly, the Church Fathers were heavily influenced by the teachings of Plato. But they were also influenced by the biblical account of Adam and Eve. They recognized that there are many clues in this story that do suggest a sexual transgression. And although many early Christians interpreted that sexual transgression in a variety of ways, nevertheless, the early Fathers were almost in unanimous agreement that sex had something to do with humanity's downward spiral.

Starting with the Protestant reformation, Luther and the other reformers began to oppose the sexual negativity that was rampant at that time. Luther married a former nun. He also prompted many who had taken a vow of celibacy to recant their vows and get married. As a reaction, the reformers opposed the church's use of the Eden account to promote sexual negativity and a low view of marriage. They recognized this as a misuse of Scripture. In this regard, I applaud the reformers.

Nevertheless, I also believe the Church Fathers had a very significant and important point. They saw many clues in the story of Adam and Eve that pointed to sex. To the Church Fathers, it just made a whole lot of sense that the sin of Adam and Eve did have something to do with a sexual transgression. Somehow, sex was polluted by sin. Perhaps this is why many early Christians felt sex per se was evil, in and of itself.

It's also reasonable that the holier a person becomes, the more they will be able to recognize just how polluted sex has become since the fall. But this in no way means that sex itself, as God originally intended it to be, is sinful. In fact, isn't it more logical that if Adam and Eve had not somehow polluted sex yesterday, sex today would be more fun and more pleasurable with a lot less guilt? Let me suggest, then, that although the Church Fathers were guilty of promoting widespread sexual negativity, the reformers, in their determination to speedily eraticate sexual negativity, also did much to damage the concept that the sin of Adam and Eve was, indeed, a sexual transgression.

Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater!

16 comments:

Matthew said...

Sir, do you honestly believe this to be true, because God created every single thing, including sex. Why would the church fathers even think that sex was bad period?

Anonymous said...

Luther was an evil, vile heretic who rejected the teachings of Jesus. I prefer to follow the teaching of Jesus which were passed down by the early fathers of the Church not the teachings of the sex crazed Luther and other sex crazed protest-ant heretics.

Ashley Hawkins said...

The fathers of the church “In other words, they were victims of society and philosophical constructs of their time. They were not able to separate their teaching from the world's philosophy and attempted to use Plato's dualism, Stoic ideals and Gnostic error to explain the scriptures.”

bayouhuguenot said...

Can you provide citations for these quotes? While I agree with your position that the fathers were neoplatonic, some of these quotes don't actually pan out.

Anonymous said...

The quotes are accurate and well known to most scholars.

Anonymous said...

I wonder what they would say if they were alive today?

Purge187 said...

As someone who's just now arriving at the point where the term "God-given sexuality" doesn't seem like an oxymoron ( I accepted Christ as Savior at 19 and turned 35 a few months ago), I thought I'd point something out.

Guys like Origen were Gnostics who obviously made the mistake of trying to repress their flesh with their flesh; when you do that, bad things happen. You get caught up in an unending circle of guilt and shame. You become bitter. And you take out those feelings on the objects that you blame for stimulating those emotions--in these cases, women. The quotes you mentioned speak for themselves.

After living like that for years, I finally decided to give grace a chance. The depression, guilt, fear and random anger are fading with each passing day. I'd like fewer things more than for fellow Christians to experience the same kind of deliverance. Church leaders can do two things to help in this regard: 1.) promote a sex-positive message rather than manipulating their congregants' emotions of fear and guilt, and 2.) stop making sexual sins akin to blaspheming the Holy Ghost.

Helena S. Lawrence said...

Indian sexy Sunny Leone Getting Fucked


Desi Indian aunties pussy photo gellary


Sexy Sunny Leone sexy hot xxx videos latest 2014


Sunny Leone latest hot topless photo shoot


Indian girls aunties boobs pussy photo gallery


hot sexy pictures photos girls without dress, showing her nudu


indian girl showing nude boobs ass photo after drink


Desi womans nudu photos, sexy indian actors nudu


Pakistani sexy & hot ACTRESS WITH WET SAREE



sexy Pakistani & indian school Girls nudu photos

Anonymous said...

"The purpose of marriage is not to have pleasure and to be idle but to procreate and bring up children, to support a household. Those who have no love for children are swine, stocks, and logs unworthy of being called men or women; for they despise the blessings of God, the Creator and Author of marriage." - Martin Luther

"...fertility was regarded as an extraordinary blessing and a special gift of God, as is clear from Deut. 28:4, where Moses numbers fertility among the blessings. 'There will not be a barren woman among you,' he says (cf.Ex.23:26). We do not regard this so highly today. Although we like and desire it in cattle, yet in the human race there are few who regard a woman's fertility as a blessing. Indeed, there are many who have an aversion for it and regard sterility as a special blessing. Surely this is also contrary to nature. Much less is it pious and saintly. For this affection has been implanted by God in man's nature, so that it desires its increase and multiplication. Accordingly, it is inhuman and godless to have a loathing for offspring. Thus someone recently called his wife a sow, since she gave birth rather often. The good for nothing and impure fellow! The saintly fathers did not feel like this at all; for they acknowledged a fruitful wife as a special blessing of God and, on the other hand, regarded sterility as a curse. And this judgment flowed from the Word of God in Gen. 1:28, where He said: 'Be fruitful and multiply.' From this they understood that children are a gift of God." (Luther's Works, Vol.5, p.325).

"But the exceedingly foul deed of Onan, the basest of wretches, follows. [here Luther quotes Gen. 389-10] Onan must have been a malicious and incorrigible scoundrel. This is a most disgraceful sin. It is far more atrocious than incest and adultery. We call it unchastity, yes a Sodomitic sin. For Onan goes in to her; that is, he lies with her and copulates, and when it comes to the point of insemination, spills the semen, lest the woman conceive. Surely at such a time the order of nature established by God in procreation should be followed. Accordingly, it was a most disgraceful crime to produce semen and excite the woman, and to frustrate her at that very moment. He was inflamed with the basest spite and hatred. Therefore he did not allow himself to be compelled to bear that intolerable slavery. Consequently, he deserved to be killed by God. He committed an evil deed. Therefore God punished him. ...That worthless fellow...preferred polluting himself with a most disgraceful sin to raising up offspring for his brother." (Luther's Works, Vol. 7, p. 20-21)

"The voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between man and woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous. For this is to extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before he is born the hoped-for offspring. The impiety is especially condemned, now by the Spirit through Moses' mouth, that Onan, as it were, by a violent abortion, no less cruelly than filthily cast upon the ground the offspring of his brother, torn from the maternal womb. Besides, in this way he tried, as far as he was able, to wipe out a part of the human race. If any woman ejects a foetus from her womb by drugs, it is reckoned a crime incapable of expiation and deservedly Onan incurred upon himself the same kind of punishment, infecting the earth by his semen, in order that Tamar might not conceive a future human being as an inhabitant of the earth." (John Calvin's Commentary on Genesis 38:8-10, translated from the Latin)

Anonymous said...

1 Timothy 4

1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

Dee Jay said...

Martin Luther was no saint. He stated (I'm paraphrasing) that when women die or suffer then oh well. That their only duty is to reproduce and nothing more.

Dee Jay said...

Martin Luther was no saint. He stated (I'm paraphrasing) that when women die or suffer then oh well. That their only duty is to reproduce and nothing more.

Sandhya Blogger said...

quotes about fathers

gamedt.info said...

Phim sex , Phim sex online , anh sex , Phim sex mp4 , tai phim sex

josna pinki said...

Hansika Motwani Pink Hairy Pussy Fuck Porn Latest Image


Aishwarya Rai Virgin Cute Pussy Hot Boobs Nangi Pic


Top 10 Bollywood Star Aishwarya Rai Doggy Style Fuck Her Boy Friend In Hotel Room XXX Video


Kareena Kapoor Doggy Style Fuck Hot Porn Image


All Bollywood Heroine Aishwarya Rai Hairy Armpit Bikini Punty Cute Boobs Pics


Hot Pakistani Model Girls Bikini Punty Less White Boobs PhotoZ

Ritik Chande said...

These relationships into a framework of rape or sexual abuse designed for women only serves to showcase your lack of intelligence and ignorance of human sexuality